Clinton Defective Products Lawyers

Consumer products are a daily part of our lives, but some products are dangerous and can cause serious injury. Manufacturers and sellers of products have a duty to protect consumers from danger resulting from the use of their products, and when they fail to do so, and a defective product causes an injury, the seller or manufacturer can be held liable for the resultant damages.

Elements of a Defective Product Case

To recover damages in a products liability case, the victim must show that a product had a defective condition that made its use unreasonably dangerous. There are three types of product defects:

  • Design defects;
  • Manufacturing defects; and
  • Advertising or warning defects.
Alphabetical blocks spell out "defect" with the "T" sideways, to represent a defective product.
free consultation

A design defect means that a product is designed in such a manner that its use is inherently dangerous. Manufacturing defects occur when a product is manufactured in a way not in accordance with its design, and the defect in the manufacturing or assembly makes the product unsafe. Marketing defects include a lack of proper instructions for use or adequate safety warnings.

A defective condition means that the product is unsafe for normal use and handling. This includes uses that are not necessarily what the product was originally intended for, but are uses that are anticipated by the manufacturer or seller.

To determine whether a product is defective and unreasonably dangerous, South Carolina courts use two tests:

  • Whether the product is unreasonably dangerous given the foreseeable conditions associated with use; and
  • Whether the danger of use outweighs the utility of the product.

Courts will look at industry standards to determine whether the design was reasonable and whether it was more dangerous than an average consumer would expect. The mere malfunctioning of a product is not sufficient to constitute a defect, and the mere fact that a product could be made safer is not enough to show that it was unreasonably dangerous.

Liable Parties in a Defective Products Claim

The theory of product liability is based on the idea that manufacturers are best able to keep defective and dangerous products out of the hands of consumers. Failing to do so can cause devastating injuries, for which manufacturers, and distributors may be held liable.

The parties that may be held liable include manufacturers, designers, producers, assemblers, and fabricators of products or parts. Sellers may also be liable, and include distributors, wholesalers, retailers, and anyone involved in selling the product.

Product Liability Claims

In South Carolina, product liability claims can be based on any of three major theories:

  • Strict liability;
  • Negligence; or
  • Breach of warranty.

Regardless of the theory, however, all products liability cases require proving that:

  • The consumer was injured by the product;
  • The product had an unreasonably dangerous, defective condition; and
  • At the time of injury, the product was in essentially the same state as when it left the defendant’s control.

TESTIMONIALS

5 star rating
From the first day I walked in there, I felt like I was in the right place. They really cared about me, and I won't forget that.

-- A. Gordan, Actual Client

See More Testimonials

RECENT BLOG

  • What Is A Medical Costs Projection and Do You Need One?

    medical billing statement paperwork after a workers' comp claim

    Blog by: Attorney Ken Harrell In handling personal injury and workers’ compensation cases for injured South Carolinians for more than 30 years, it has become apparent to me that my clients’ future medical costs are often a crucial component of… read more

    Continue Reading
  • Wait Before Applying for Social Security Disability if Claiming Worker’ Compensation Benefits

    worker injured on duty

    Many of our most seriously injured workers’ compensation clients also end up applying for Social Security disability benefits because their permanent physical restrictions from their injuries (combined with a host of other factors) are such that no reasonably stable job… read more

    Continue Reading
  • After A Truck Accident In Clinton, Who Is Sued: The Driver Or The Trucking Company?

    While Clinton, South Carolina is home to only 8,000 people, one of the most dangerous trucking highways in the country passes through our home town. Every year the Department of Transportation makes a list of the most dangerous highways in… read more

    Continue Reading
  • Should You Worry About Anesthesia Errors in Clinton, South Carolina?

    During surgery and other invasive medical procedures, patients are often administered anesthesia. This is a vital part of the process, as anesthesia will help to dramatically reduce a patient’s pain. However, it is important to note that anesthesia is a… read more

    Continue Reading
  • The Most Common Manufacturing Accidents in Clinton

    According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), workers in the manufacturing industry face injury risks that are well above the national average. In fact, the BLS reports that over 100,000 manufacturing workers suffer significant on-the-job injuries each… read more

    Continue Reading

Strict Liability

Strict liability means that the victim of an accident caused by a defective product need not prove the manufacturer or distributor’s negligence in order to recover damages. Rather, he or she must only prove that:

  • The product was defective;
  • The defect caused the victim’s injury; and
  • At the time of the accident, the product’s state was not substantially altered from the time it left the defendant’s possession.

In strict liability, the focus is on the condition of the product. It is intended to ensure that manufacturers test products before putting them on the market, to keep consumers safe.

Negligence

To bring a products liability claim under a negligence theory, the victim must show that:

  • He or she was injured by a product;
  • The injury occurred because of the product’s dangerously defective condition;
  • At the time of the injury, the product was in basically the same condition as when it left the seller or manufacturer’s possession; and
  • The seller or manufacturer breached in some manner its duty to exercise due care.

Unlike in a strict liability claim, the focus in a negligence claim is on the defendant seller or manufacturer’s actions, and the victim must prove the defendant’s fault in order to recover damages.

Breach of Warranty

In a breach of warranty claim, in addition to proving the injury, the defective condition, and the unchanged state of the product, the victim must also prove that:

  • The seller or manufacturer made a warranty to the consumer; and
  • The warranty was breached at the time the product left the seller or manufacturer’s control.

There are three types of breach of warranty under which a consumer can recover in a products liability case:

  • Breach of express warranty;
  • Breach of implied warranty of merchantability; and
  • Breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.

Express warranties are a manufacturer or seller’s explicit guarantee, relied upon by the purchaser. Express warranties may be made either verbally or in writing. If the product does not conform to that guarantee, the defendant may be liable for any resultant injuries. For example, if a seller says that a hair dryer can be used around water without a risk of electrocution, and the consumer is later electrocuted while using the hair dryer near water, the seller has breached an express warranty and will be liable.

The implied warranty of merchantability means that goods for sale must be merchantable, or of adequate quality and suitable for the ordinary purposes for which goods of that type are used.

For example, a bicycle should be able to support a rider, have functional brakes, be properly steered, and generally not fall apart when ridden. If it fails to do any of these things, it may have breached the implied warranty of merchantability.

The implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose means that when a seller has reason to know that the purchaser is looking for a product to suit a particular purpose and recommends a certain product, the seller may be liable if he or she sells the buyer a product that is not suited for that purpose. For example, if a buyer asks a seller to recommend a helmet suitable for motorcycle riding, and the seller offers a helmet that is not strong enough to protect a motorcyclist in the event of a crash, the seller may be liable if the purchaser subsequently suffers a head injury in a motorcycle accident, that could have been prevented by a proper helmet.

Contact a Clinton Defective Product Lawyer Today

If you or a loved one has been injured by the use of a defective consumer product, please contact a Clinton products liability attorney today at the Joye Law Firm (877) 933-9707 for a free initial consultation.

Partners

  • Mark Joye
    Mark Joye

    Mark Joye

  • Ken Harrell

Attorneys

  • Joye Law Firm Lawyer Davis Rice
    Joye Law Firm Lawyer Davis Rice

    Davis Rice

CASE STUDIES

Sizeable Settlement

Teen Who Lost an Arm on the Job

A significant, confidential settlement was reached for a young Joye Law Firm client who suffered life-altering injuries at his after-school job. Joye ...

Read More

$700,000

18-Wheeler Driver Nearly Killed in the Line of Duty

Johnnie was on his way home when a car ran a stop sign in front of his 18-wheeler, causing a serious accident.  Thinking quickly, Johnnie’s heroic ...

Read More

Multi-Million Dollar Settlement

South Carolina Man Nearly Killed in Head-on Collision on I-526.

When a truck hauling heavy machinery crossed the grass median and entered the eastbound lanes of I-526, Dillon Wright’s small passenger vehicle didn...

Read More

trust is important to us

Contact Image

we want to hear about your case