The Retreat at Brightwater in Myrtle Beach, SC was cited after the facility “failed to review and revise [a resident’s] care plan for elopement.” The resident – who was deemed the “highest risk” for elopement – wandered outside of the facility two times before the facility updated the care plan to keep the resident safely inside.

The investigator of this citation reviewed documents regarding the resident’s past elopement behavior. The records revealed the resident was “wandering in rooms and hallways and calling for his/her son/daughter. Acts of diversion and reorientation were used as requested by the son/daughter.” According to the citation, “no new wandering/elopement risk screening was performed, and no new interventions were added to the resident’s care plan.”

Further review of a nurse’s notes showed that the resident was found one night, wandering outside around midnight. The resident was confused about where they were. The resident left the facility again a few days later without anyone noticing. This time, the resident was found down the road and across the street. The nursing home’s courtesy officer used a golf cart to retrieve the resident. Even after these two instances, the resident’s care plan was not updated. There were no new interventions put in place to keep the resident safely inside the facility.

During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and facility administrator, the DON confirmed nothing was done to keep the resident from leaving the facility. The DON also reviewed the resident’s care plan to see if they had a “wanderguard device.” Wandergaurd devices are used to support caregivers by triggering alarms or locking monitored doors from afar to keep residents from leaving. A device like this was not given to the resident until they had already left the facility two times.

Upon further investigation, the investigator discovered that the resident managed to leave the facility a third time, even with a wanderguard device. They were found right outside the gates on the sidewalk. After the resident was brought back to the facility, there was “no documentation that a new wandering/elopement assessment was performed and there were no new care plan interventions.”

During an interview, a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was asked when she was last trained on elopement/wandering. She stated, “I don’t remember the exact date. It was a couple of weeks ago.” The investigator then asked why the CNA’s signature was on the sign-sheet attached to training information. The CNA said, “because they told me to.” She had not received any training before signing the form. The CNA stated she “usually does training from home but had not done any in a while.”

The facility in this citation didn’t follow through on several critical processes to keep a resident safe. Because of this, the resident wandered about the facility, ultimately leaving the nursing home. This put the resident at risk of getting lost completely or even getting hit by a car in traffic. In addition, even though the facility knew the resident was a high risk for eloping, they did not take the necessary steps toward updating and implementing a care plan. They also instructed a CNA to say she had completed a training on elopement behavior by signing a paper, when she really had not. These kinds of actions not only put the resident in this citation in danger, but all residents who are a high risk for eloping.

Don’t Wait. Get Help for Nursing Home Abuse Today.

If you suspect nursing home abuse, we will provide a free, confidential case evaluation with no obligation to hire us. With nearly 250 years of shared experience, Joye Law Firm attorneys are consistently recognized by clients and peers at the highest level of professional excellence. We make sure to fight hard for our clients and are honest with them every step of the way.

About the Author

Since 1968, the South Carolina personal injury and workers’ compensation attorneys of Joye Law Firm have been committed to securing compensation for accident and injury victims. Our compassionate and dedicated lawyers have nearly 250 years of combined litigation experience, and many of them have been recognized as South Carolina Super Lawyers. For many years, our South Carolina personal injury law firm has been listed with an AV rating in the prestigious Martindale-Hubbell legal directory.

Recent Blog Post
What to Do if Someone is Tailgating You

Tailgating or following too closely behind another car is dangerous behavior, and often a form of road rage. It can easily lead to rear-end collisions and injury accidents. In South Carolina, 3,494 people were injured in 2019 by drivers following…

south carolina statute of limitations personal injury
What Is the Statute of Limitations for a Personal Injury Claim in South Carolina?

South Carolina law gives a person who has been injured by another party’s action or inaction three years in most situations to file a lawsuit seeking compensation for their injuries, financial losses, and pain and suffering. If the claim is…

How to Stay Out of Other Drivers’ Blind Spots on Your Motorcycle

Bikers need to be aware of all potential hazards on the road. That’s because the consequences of a minor collision on a motorcycle can be much more severe than in a car. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,…

Who is Liable for Boating Accidents in Bad Weather?

Boating is a popular recreational activity in South Carolina, with thousands of people taking to the state’s lakes, rivers and shores every year. However, weather conditions can often shift abruptly, and failing to stay informed and take the necessary precautions…

Awards & Recognition
Best Law Firm 2022
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
B Member
Martindale-Hubbell
Best Lawyers 2021 Small
BBB
ASJ Leaders Forum
National Trial Lawyers Top 100
Google Review
Avvo Rating
Media
CBS News
Fox
NBC
ABC